Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Difference between Wi-Fi Networks and Wired LAN Networks

Have you eternally theory of having an all wireless position? Do you think it is not probable on this point/ it is not workable? If your answer to to facilitate question is why not?, at that moment you need to read this article in lieu of surefire.

Let us look on the reverse state of affairs principal: What can maybe be the advantages of wired networks more than wireless networks? Well, the immediate points to facilitate comes to our mind can be the following:

1. Speed. Wireless networks are considered to be slow on the uptake and having a low bandwidth.

2. Real instance applications. Wireless networks cannot carry out real instance applications like voice and tape.

3. Security. The wireless signals connect with even across the road. What if someone hacks in to my set of connections?

4. Incompatibility: Certain strategy like printers and the like. Are not Wi-Fi enabled. The PC does not bear Wi-Fi cards.

Wired networks had a decent race of 100 Mbps and these days bear a race of 1000 Mbps. Wireless networks individual bear a race of 54 Mbps and to facilitate too is shared in the company of many users.

A decent tape conferencing client might not take more than 256-384 Kbps in lieu of giving 30 f/s quality tape with H.264 compression. How many such conferences are obtainable to go down at the same time? And real instance applications run very well if your wireless controller can support WMM - Wireless Multi Media protocol which prioritize the real instance traffic more than the average traffic, and largely of the controllers at present support it. Even voice is supported on the wireless LAN - with the seamless handover from individual AP to an added, if you are moving the VoWLAN handsets. There is an out of the ordinary tools to facilitate is growing fast, which is called FMC - Fixed transportable Convergence wherever your IP Phones and Cell phones can be integrated with a single mobile handset and you bear individual run to in lieu of both.